Building a shared model for multi-criteria group decision making : experience from a case study for sustainable transportation planning in Quebec City

Authors: Marleau Donais, FrancisAbi-Zeid, IrèneLavoie, Roxane
Abstract: Shared procedures to build a consensus within a group decision process are sometimes used in multi-criteria decision-making. Facilitators often face several challenges and the solutions to overcome them are scarce and not well documented. This paper presents a case study within a decision framework that combines problem structuring with the multi-criteria decision aid method MACBETH in order to build a shared preference model. The framework was applied in a transportation planning context with a group of professionals from Quebec City, Canada to assess and rank streets as a function of their potential to become Complete Streets. The analysis of the process showed that difficulties in expressing preferences, access to data during workshops, group size, group discussion management, and project length were encountered. Nonetheless, the proposed framework and the use of sub-groups to build criteria scales were a way to overcome these challenges and allowed us to successfully complete the project.
Document Type: Article dans une conférence
Issue Date: 2017
Open Access Date: Restricted access
Document version: AM
Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/70401
This document was published in: Group decision and negotiation : a socio-technical perspective
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63546-0_13
Springer
Collection:Chapitres de livre

Files in this item:
Description SizeFormat 
GDN-2017_paper_Pre-copy-edit.pdf
293.06 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
All documents in CorpusUL are protected by Copyright Act of Canada.