Site complementarity between biodiversity and ecosystem services in conservation planning of sparsely-populated regions.

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCimon-Morin, Jérôme-
dc.contributor.authorDarveau, Marcel-
dc.contributor.authorPoulin, Monique-
dc.coverage.spatialCanada (Est)fr_CA
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-23T14:13:59Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-23-
dc.date.issued2015-06-02-
dc.identifier.issn0376-8929fr_CA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/521-
dc.description.abstractThe consequences of considering ecosystem services (ES) in conservation assessment are still widely debated. The degree of success depends on the extent to which biodiversity and ES can be secured under joint conservation actions. Unlike biodiversity, ES conservation is inseparably linked to human beneficiaries. Reconciling biodiversity with ES and conservation can be particularly challenging in sparsely populated areas. This study, in a sparselypopulated region of eastern Canada, focused on freshwater wetland biodiversity and ten ES provided by wetlands. Within a given maximal total area, the results showed that planning for biodiversity underrepresented local flow ES supply by 57% and demand by 61% in conservation networks. Planning for ES alone underrepresented wetland biodiversity surrogates by an average of 34%. Considering both biodiversity and ES simultaneously, all of the biodiversity and ES targets were achieved with only a 6% mean increase in area. Achieving all conservation targets starting from a network that was primarily built for either ES or biodiversity features alone was two to five times less efficient than considering both ES and biodiversity simultaneously in conservation assessment. A better framework is required to translate these spatial synergies into effective joint conservation actions.fr_CA
dc.languageengfr_CA
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressfr_CA
dc.subjectboreal, conservation assessment, ecological service, systematic conservation planning, wetland-
dc.titleSite complementarity between biodiversity and ecosystem services in conservation planning of sparsely-populated regions.fr_CA
dc.typeCOAR1_1::Texte::Périodique::Revue::Contribution à un journal::Article::Article de recherche-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEnvironmental Conservation, Vol. 43 (1), 56–68 (2016)fr_CA
dc.audienceProfesseurs (Enseignement supérieur)fr_CA
dc.audienceÉtudiantsfr_CA
dc.audienceDoctorantsfr_CA
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0376892915000132fr_CA
dc.subject.rvmServices des écosystèmesfr_CA
dc.subject.rvmRégions à faible densité de population -- Conservationfr_CA
dc.subject.rvmZones humides -- Conservationfr_CA
dc.subject.rvmBiodiversité aquatique -- Conservationfr_CA
dc.subject.rvmHabitat (Écologie) -- Conservation -- Planificationfr_CA
rioxxterms.versionAccepted Manuscriptfr_CA
rioxxterms.version_of_recordhttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892915000132fr_CA
rioxxterms.project.funder_nameNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canadafr_CA
bul.rights.periodeEmbargo6mfr_CA
Collection:Articles publiés dans des revues avec comité de lecture

Files in this item:
SizeFormat 
JCimonMorin_manuscript_revised.docx1.33 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
All documents in CorpusUL are protected by Copyright Act of Canada.