Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis : the multicenter TOPAS (truly or pseudo-severe aortic stenosis) study

Authors: Blais, Claudia; Burwash, Ian G.; Mundigler, Gerald; Dumesnil, Jean G.; Loho, Nicole; Rader, Florian; Baumgartner, Helmut; Beanlands, Robert S. B.; Chayer, Boris; Kadem, Lyes; Garcia, Damien; Durand, Louis-Gilles; Pibarot, Philippe
Abstract: Background— We sought to investigate the use of a new parameter, the projected effective orifice area (EOAproj) at normal transvalvular flow rate (250 mL/s), to better differentiate between truly severe (TS) and pseudo-severe (PS) aortic stenosis (AS) during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). Changes in various parameters of stenosis severity have been used to differentiate between TS and PS AS during DSE. However, the magnitude of these changes lacks standardization because they are dependent on the variable magnitude of the transvalvular flow change occurring during DSE. Methods and Results— The use of EOAproj to differentiate TS from PS AS was investigated in an in vitro model and in 23 patients with low-flow AS (indexed EOA <0.6 cm2/m2, left ventricular ejection fraction =40%) undergoing DSE and subsequent aortic valve replacement. For an individual valve, EOA was plotted against transvalvular flow (Q) at each dobutamine stage, and valve compliance (VC) was derived as the slope of the regression line fitted to the EOA versus Q plot; EOAproj was calculated as EOAproj=EOArest+VC×(250-Qrest), where EOArest and Qrest are the EOA and Q at rest. Classification between TS and PS was based on either response to flow increase (in vitro) or visual inspection at surgery (in vivo). EOAproj was the most accurate parameter in differentiating between TS and PS both in vitro and in vivo. In vivo, 15 of 23 patients (65%) had TS and 8 of 23 (35%) had PS. The percentage of correct classification was 83% for EOAproj and 91% for indexed EOAproj compared with percentages of 61% to 74% for the other echocardiographic parameters usually used for this purpose. Conclusions— EOAproj provides a standardized evaluation of AS severity with DSE and improves the diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing TS and PS AS in patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS.
Document Type: Article de recherche
Issue Date: 7 February 2006
Open Access Date: Restricted access
Document version: VoR
This document was published in: Circulation, Vol. 113 (5), 711-721 (2006)
American Heart Association
Alternative version: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.557678
Collection:Articles publiés dans des revues avec comité de lecture

Files in this item:
692.48 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
All documents in CorpusUL are protected by Copyright Act of Canada.