Validation and characterization of transcatheter aortic valve effective orifice area measured by Doppler echocardiography

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClavel, Marie-Annick-
dc.contributor.authorRodés-Cabau, Josep-
dc.contributor.authorDumont, Éric-
dc.contributor.authorBagur, Rodrigo Hernan-
dc.contributor.authorBergeron, Sébastien-
dc.contributor.authorDe Larochellière, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorLarose, Éric-
dc.contributor.authorDumesnil, Jean G.-
dc.contributor.authorPibarot, Philippe-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-26T17:21:24Z-
dc.date.available10000-01-01-
dc.date.issued2011-10-04-
dc.identifier.issn1936-878Xfr_CA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/2309-
dc.description.abstractObjectives : The objectives were to compare different Doppler echocardiographic methods for the measurement of prosthetic valve effective orifice area (EOA) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to determine the factors influencing the EOA of transcatheter balloon expandable valves.fr_CA
dc.description.abstractBackground : Previous studies have used different methods for the measurement of the valve EOA following TAVI. Factors influencing the EOA of transcatheter valves are unknown.fr_CA
dc.description.abstractMethods : A total of 122 patients underwent TAVI with the use of the Edwards-SAPIEN valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California). The EOA was measured by transthoracic echocardiography at hospital discharge, 6 months and 1 year after TAVI with the use of 2 methods as described in previous studies. In Method #1 (EOA1), LVOT diameter (LVOTd) entered in the continuity equation was measured at the base of prosthesis cusps whereas, in Method #2 (EOA2), LVOTd was measured immediately proximal to the prosthesis stent.fr_CA
dc.description.abstractResults : The average EOA2 (1.57 ± 0.41 cm2) was larger (p < 0.01) than the EOA1 (1.21 ± 0.38 cm2). Accordingly, incidence of severe PPM (indexed EOA =0.65 cm2/m2) was 3-fold lower with the use of EOA2 than with EOA1 (9% vs. 33%; p < 0.001). Mean transprosthetic gradient correlated better (p = 0.03) with indexed EOA2 (r = -0.70, p < 0.0001) than with indexed EOA1 (r = -0.58, p < 0.0001). Intraobserver and interobserver variability were lower for EOA2 compared to EOA1 (intra: 5% vs. 7%, p = 0.06; inter: 6% vs. 14%; p < 0.001). Aortic annulus size was the sole independent determinant (p = 0.01) of prosthetic valve EOA2. The average EOA varied from 1.37 ± 0.23 cm2 for aortic annulus size <19 mm up to 1.90 ± 0.17 cm2 for size >23 mm.fr_CA
dc.description.abstractConclusions : When estimating the EOA of Edwards-SAPIEN valves by Doppler-echocardiography, it is recommended to use the LVOT diameter and velocity measured immediately proximal to the stent. The main determinant of the EOA of transcatheter valves is the patient's annulus size and these valves provide excellent hemodynamics even in patients with a small aortic annulus.fr_CA
dc.languageengfr_CA
dc.publisherAmerican College of Cardiologyfr_CA
dc.subjectaortic stenosisfr_CA
dc.subjectechocardiographyfr_CA
dc.subjectprosthesisfr_CA
dc.subjecttranscatheterfr_CA
dc.subjectvalvesfr_CA
dc.titleValidation and characterization of transcatheter aortic valve effective orifice area measured by Doppler echocardiographyfr_CA
dc.typeCOAR1_1::Texte::Périodique::Revue::Contribution à un journal::Article::Article de recherche-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJACC : Cardiovascular Imaging, Vol. 4 (10), 1053–1062 (2011)fr_CA
dc.audienceProfesseurs (Enseignement supérieur)fr_CA
dc.audienceÉtudiantsfr_CA
dc.audienceDoctorantsfr_CA
dc.audienceMédecinsfr_CA
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.06.021fr_CA
dc.identifier.pubmed21999863fr_CA
dc.subject.rvmAorte -- Rétrécissementfr_CA
dc.subject.rvmÉchocardiographie Dopplerfr_CA
dc.subject.rvmCathétérisme cardiaquefr_CA
dc.subject.rvmProthèses valvulaires cardiaquesfr_CA
rioxxterms.versionVersion of Recordfr_CA
rioxxterms.version_of_recordhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.06.021fr_CA
bul.rights.periodeEmbargoInfinifr_CA
Collection:Articles publiés dans des revues avec comité de lecture

Files in this item:
Description SizeFormat 
Clavel2011-12815.pdf
818.2 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
All documents in CorpusUL are protected by Copyright Act of Canada.