Do peer effects shape property values?

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDes Rosiers, François-
dc.contributor.authorDubé, Jean-
dc.contributor.authorThériault, Marius-
dc.coverage.spatialQuébec (Province)fr_CA
dc.description.abstractPurpose – Both hedonics and the traditional sales comparison approach are derived from a similar paradigm with respect to how prices, hence market values, are determined. While the hedonic approach can provide reliable estimates of individual attributes’ marginal contribution, it may – unlike the sales comparison approach – underestimate the prominent influence that surrounding properties exert on any given nearby housing unit and sale price. This paper seeks to develop a simple method for reconciling the two approaches within a rigorous conceptual and methodological framework. Design/methodology/approach – Peer effect models, an analytical device developed, and mainly used, by labour economists, are adapted to the hedonic price equation so as to incorporate nearby properties’ influences, thereby controlling for non-observable neighbourhood effects. In addition to basic, intrinsic, building and land attributes, the ensuing model accounts for three types of effects, namely endogenous interactions effects (i.e. comparable sales influences, or peer effects), exogenous, or neighbourhood, effects and, finally, spatial autocorrelation effects. Findings – Preliminary findings suggest that integrating peer effects in the hedonic equation allows bringing out the combined impacts of endogenous, exogenous and spatially correlated effects in the house price determination process, with spatial autocorrelation of model residuals being significantly reduced, even without resorting to a spatial autoregressive procedure. Research limitations/implications – Further investigation is still needed in order to find out which submarket delineation should be used to obtain optimal model performances. Originality/value – The paper leads to the conclusion that the comparable sales approach, as used in traditional appraisal practice, is valid, although its application is typically flawed by the too small sample size generally used by appraisers. Further investigation is still needed, however, in order to find out which submarket delineation should be used to obtain optimal model performances. This raises the paramount question as to whether the peer effect variable is adequately measured and addresses the tricky issue of kernel determination in spatial statistics and related applications, such as GWRfr_CA
dc.subjectHedonic price modellingfr_CA
dc.subjectPeer effect modelsfr_CA
dc.subjectProperty valuesfr_CA
dc.subjectAsset valuationfr_CA
dc.titleDo peer effects shape property values?fr_CA
dc.typeCOAR1_1::Texte::Périodique::Revue::Contribution à un journal::Article::Article de recherche-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of Property Investment & Finance, Vol. 29 (4/5), 510–528 (2011)fr_CA
dc.audienceProfesseurs (Enseignement supérieur)fr_CA
dc.subject.rvmBiens réels -- Prix -- Évaluation -- Modèles mathématiquesfr_CA
dc.subject.rvmMaisons individuelles -- Prix -- Évaluation -- Modèles mathématiquesfr_CA
dc.subject.rvmPrix hédoniques-
rioxxterms.versionVersion of Recordfr_CA
Collection:Articles publiés dans des revues avec comité de lecture

Files in this item:
Description SizeFormat 
Des Rosiers et al. (2011)-JPIF.pdf
200.06 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
All documents in CorpusUL are protected by Copyright Act of Canada.