International alliances of small biotechnology firms : a second-best option?
|Abstract:||International strategic alliances have often been presented as the main growth factor for dedicated biotechnology firms (DBFs). Alliances bring resources such as complementary knowledge and financial resources to DBFs. They help these smaller firms conduct R&D, and costly and long clinical essays and regulations. They build bridges with foreign capital and product markets. Even if some authors have noticed that alliances are not always beneficial or feasible, the main picture has not been altered: they are still presented as a bounty for smaller R&D biotechnology firms. Our research, based on in-depth interviews of samples of DBFs in Montreal and Boston, suggests that, in both clusters, they use alliances as a second-best option. The preferred strategy is to conduct in-house R&D supported by venture capital and capital market funds, and only sign alliances at the latest possible time, in order to complete the R&D process.|
|Document Type:||Article de recherche|
|Issue Date:||1 January 2014|
|Open Access Date:||23 January 2018|
|This document was published in:||International Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 13 (1/2/3), 53-65 (2014)|
|Collection:||Articles publiés dans des revues avec comité de lecture|
Files in this item:
|International strategic alliances of small biotechnology firms a second-best option.pdf||184 kB||Adobe PDF|
|International strategic alliances of small.pdf||Version of Record||178.51 kB||Adobe PDF||Request a copy|
All documents in CorpusUL are protected by Copyright Act of Canada.