Team consensus concerning important outcomes for augmentative and alternative communication assistive technologies : a pilot study.

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLamontagne, Marie-Eve-
dc.contributor.authorRouthier, François-
dc.contributor.authorAuger, Claudine-
dc.coverage.spatialQuébec (Province)fr
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-24T21:42:49Z-
dc.date.available9999-12-31-
dc.date.issued2013-05-27-
dc.identifier.issn0743-4618fr
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/15698-
dc.description.abstractObstacles to assistive device outcome measurement include a lack of consensus about which outcomes should be evaluated. This article reports a case study of the use of a structured consensus-building approach called Technique for Research of Information by Animation of a Group of Experts (TRIAGE) to develop agreement among key professional team members with regard to outcome measurement. We also describe the changes in key professional team members’ perspectives on outcome measurement over time. Initially, participants expressed preferences for the measurement of about 33 different outcomes. Subsequent discussions and the TRIAGE process led to the choice of the five most important outcomes. Our case study provides evidence that professional team consensus could successfully be reached through the individual reflections and group sharing proposed by the TRIAGE technique. Future research directions include the development of strategies to give prominence to the opinions of individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in the identification of important outcomes, and for aggregating and interpreting data gathered at local, regional, or national levels.fr
dc.languageengfr
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis groupfr
dc.subjectOutcome assessmentfr
dc.subjectAssistive technologyfr
dc.subjectProgram evaluationfr
dc.subjectConsensus developmentfr
dc.subjectEvidence-based health carefr
dc.titleTeam consensus concerning important outcomes for augmentative and alternative communication assistive technologies : a pilot study.fr
dc.typeCOAR1_1::Texte::Périodique::Revue::Contribution à un journal::Article::Article de recherchefr
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAugmentative and alternative communication, Vol. 29 (2), 182–189 (2013)fr
dc.audienceProfesseurs (Enseignement supérieur)fr
dc.audienceÉtudiantsfr
dc.audienceDoctorantsfr
dc.audiencePersonnel médicalfr
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/07434618.2013.784927fr
dc.identifier.pubmed23705816fr
dc.subject.rvmAides fonctionnelles (Médecine physique) -- Évaluationfr
dc.subject.rvmÉvaluation des résultats (Soins médicaux)fr
dc.subject.rvmSoins médicaux -- Travail en équipefr
rioxxterms.versionVersion of Recordfr
rioxxterms.version_of_recordhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.784927fr
bul.rights.periodeEmbargoInfinifr
Collection:Articles publiés dans des revues avec comité de lecture

Files in this item:
Description SizeFormat 
Lamontagne ME & al. Aug. Alter Com_2013.pdf
280.55 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
All documents in CorpusUL are protected by Copyright Act of Canada.