Ten theses on dissent

Auteur(s): Belleau, Marie-Claire; Johnson, Rebecca
Résumé: Belleau and Johnson respond to the three articles in the Focus Feature. Agreeing with the general proposition that dissent matters, that it is valuable, and that it strengthens our system of law, they share ten theses on dissent. These theses touch on: dissent as a structural feature of our system; the linking of emotion and reason in the language of dissent; the articulation of tensions between principle and practice across different categories of dissent; the variable emergence of dissent across different legal topics; the need for attention to both heightened dissent and its absence; the impact of judicial identity on dissent; dissent as a (sometimes invisible) process rather than only a product; different currents with respect to dissenting practice at the trial, appellate, and Supreme Court levels; dissent as legal pedagogy; the role of the reader of dissent; and the place of dissent in nourishing the legal imaginary. In brief, they argue that lawyers, law professors, and the public more generally ought to attend to judicial dissent in order to engage with the ways that our system of justice operates, renews itself, and changes.
Type de document: Article de recherche
Date de publication: 1 mars 2017
Date de la mise en libre accès: 1 mars 2018
Version du document: VoR
Lien permanent: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/15696
Ce document a été publié dans: The University of Toronto law journal, Vol. 67 (2), 156-174 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3138/UTLJ.4217
University of Toronto Press.
Autre version disponible: 10.3138/UTLJ.4217
Collection :Articles publiés dans des revues avec comité de lecture

Fichier(s) :
Description TailleFormat 
Ten theses on dissent.pdf370.67 kBAdobe PDFMiniature
Télécharger
Tous les documents dans CorpusUL sont protégés par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur du Canada.