Ten theses on dissent

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBelleau, Marie-Claire-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Rebecca-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-24T19:29:49Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-01T00:00:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-03-01-
dc.identifier.issn0042-0220fr
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/15696-
dc.description.abstractBelleau and Johnson respond to the three articles in the Focus Feature. Agreeing with the general proposition that dissent matters, that it is valuable, and that it strengthens our system of law, they share ten theses on dissent. These theses touch on: dissent as a structural feature of our system; the linking of emotion and reason in the language of dissent; the articulation of tensions between principle and practice across different categories of dissent; the variable emergence of dissent across different legal topics; the need for attention to both heightened dissent and its absence; the impact of judicial identity on dissent; dissent as a (sometimes invisible) process rather than only a product; different currents with respect to dissenting practice at the trial, appellate, and Supreme Court levels; dissent as legal pedagogy; the role of the reader of dissent; and the place of dissent in nourishing the legal imaginary. In brief, they argue that lawyers, law professors, and the public more generally ought to attend to judicial dissent in order to engage with the ways that our system of justice operates, renews itself, and changes.fr
dc.languageengfr
dc.publisherUniversity of Toronto Press.fr
dc.subjectJudgesfr
dc.subjectDissentfr
dc.subjectIdentityfr
dc.subjectLanguagefr
dc.titleTen theses on dissentfr
dc.typeCOAR1_1::Texte::Périodique::Revue::Contribution à un journal::Article::Article de recherchefr
dcterms.bibliographicCitationThe University of Toronto law journal, Vol. 67 (2), 156-174 (2017)fr
dc.audienceProfesseurs (Enseignement supérieur)fr
dc.audienceÉtudiantsfr
dc.audienceDoctorantsfr
dc.identifier.doi10.3138/UTLJ.4217fr
dc.subject.rvmJugesfr
dc.subject.rvmProcessus judiciairefr
rioxxterms.versionVersion of Recordfr
rioxxterms.version_of_recordhttps://doi.org/10.3138/UTLJ.4217fr
bul.rights.periodeEmbargo12 moisfr
bul.rights.addendumEmbargo de 12 mois. Publié au printemps 2017, donc embargo sur le post-pint jusqu'au printemps 2018.fr
Collection:Articles publiés dans des revues avec comité de lecture

Files in this item:
Description SizeFormat 
Ten theses on dissent.pdf370.67 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
All documents in CorpusUL are protected by Copyright Act of Canada.