Legitimizing corporate (Un) sustainability : a case study of passive SMEs

Auteur(s): Chassé, SoniaBoiral, Olivier
Résumé: The objective of this article is to explore how decision makers in small- and medium-sized enterprises explain their lack of commitment to sustainability through various justifications. These justifications are intended to rationalize and legitimize, through socially acceptable arguments, the absence of substantial actions in this area. A case study based on 33 interviews in nine Canadian small- and medium-sized enterprises showed that managers rationalize their lack of commitment to sustainability in several different ways. These can be grouped into three main types of justifications: prioritization of economic survival, looking for a scapegoat, and denial and minimization (denial of negative impacts, minimization of sustainability issues, selfproclaimed sustainability). The study contributes to bridge the gap between the literatures on neutralization theory, resistance to institutional pressures, and corporate unsustainability. It also sheds further light on the reasons underlying the lack of commitment to sustainable development and how managers justify this to themselves and others.
Type de document: Article de recherche
Date de publication: 3 octobre 2016
Date de la mise en libre accès: 13 avril 2017
Version du document: AM
Lien permanent: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/13642
Ce document a été publié dans: Organization and Environment, (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616672065
SAGE Publications
Autre version disponible: 10.1177/1086026616672065
Collection :Articles publiés dans des revues avec comité de lecture

Fichier(s) :
Description TailleFormat 
Legitimizing corporate (un)sustainability A case study of passive SMEs.pdf505.12 kBAdobe PDFMiniature
Télécharger
Tous les documents dans CorpusUL sont protégés par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur du Canada.