Publication :
Prevalence of left ventricle non-compaction criteria in adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve versus healthy control subjects

bul.description.provenanceeb bde spbfr
bul.rights.dateAccepPubl2018-10-07fr
bul.rights.periodeEmbargoP0Mfr
bul.rights.typeDatedatePublicationfr
dc.contributor.authorGuzzetti, Ezequiel
dc.contributor.authorTizón-Marcos, Helena
dc.contributor.authorLarose, Éric
dc.contributor.authorShen, Mylène
dc.contributor.authorLe Ven, Florent
dc.contributor.authorChetaille, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorBédard, Élisabeth
dc.contributor.authorCapoulade, Romain
dc.contributor.authorPibarot, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorClavel, Marie-Annick
dc.contributor.authorTastet, Lionel
dc.contributor.authorSalaun, Erwan
dc.contributor.authorArsenault, Marie
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-24T16:54:16Z
dc.date.available2020-04-24T16:54:16Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-07
dc.description.abstractObjective The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of left ventricle non-compaction (LVNC) criteria (or hypertrabeculation) in a cohort of patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and healthy control subjects (CTL) without cardiovascular disease using cardiovascular MR (CMR). Methods 79 patients with BAV and 85 CTL with tricuspid aortic valve and free of known cardiovascular disease underwent CMR to evaluate the presence of LVNC criteria. The left ventricle was assessed at end-systole and end-diastole, in the short-axis, two-chamber and four-chamber views and divided into the 16 standardised myocardial segments. LVNC was assessed using the non-compacted/compacted (NC/C) myocardium ratio and was considered to be present if at least one of the myocardial segments had a NC/C ratio superior to the cut-off values defined in previous studies: Jenni et al (>2.0 end-systole); Petersen et al (>2.3 end-diastole); or Fazio et al (>2.5 end-diastole). Results 15 CTL (17.6%) vs 8 BAV (10.1%) fulfilled Jenni et al’s criterion; 69 CTL (81.2%) vs 49 BAV (62.0%) fulfilled Petersen et al’s criterion; and 66 CTL (77.6%) vs 43 BAV (54.4%) fulfilled Fazio et al’s criterion. Petersen et al and Fazio et al’s LVNC criteria were met more often by CTL (p=0.006 and p=0.002, respectively) than patients with BAV, whereas this difference was not statistically significant according to Jenni et al’s criterion (p=0.17). In multivariable analyses, after adjusting for age, sex, the presence of significant valve dysfunction (>mild stenosis or >mild regurgitation), indexed LV mass, indexed LV end-diastolic volume and LV ejection fraction, BAV was not associated with any of the three LVNC criteria. Conclusion Patients with BAV do not harbour more LVNC than the general population and there is no evidence that they are at higher risk for the development of LVNC cardiomyopathy.fr
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/openhrt-2018-000869fr
dc.identifier.issn2053-3624fr
dc.identifier.pubmed30364562fr
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/39020
dc.languageengfr
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupfr
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subjectBicuspid aortic valvefr
dc.subjectLeft ventricle non-compactionfr
dc.subjectHypertrabeculationfr
dc.subjectCardiomyopathyfr
dc.subject.rvmBicuspidie valvulaire aortiquefr
dc.subject.rvmCœur -- Ventricule gauchefr
dc.subject.rvmCardiomyopathiesfr
dc.titlePrevalence of left ventricle non-compaction criteria in adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve versus healthy control subjectsfr
dc.title.alternativeLeft ventricle non-compaction in bicuspid aortic valve patientsfr
dc.typearticle de recherche
dc.type.legacyCOAR1_1::Texte::Périodique::Revue::Contribution à un journal::Article::Article de recherchefr
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOpen Heart, Vol. 5 (2) (2018)fr
dspace.accessstatus.time2023-05-26 18:22:20
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1324408e-e205-485a-95b8-0bf86861249d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication36b55b6c-08a8-41d6-a294-d1b8609a6fe1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3b88e7fd-79bb-4266-9de9-5d83c3c4253b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication53b99cc3-eff4-406b-b875-b950cdaa30e1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5572b5af-08a6-4ce7-830b-9b26da44818a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication561be6ad-5482-44ff-bbb7-b1422dcbee15
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6caf884f-65f6-4f91-9c60-d742c2eecfcb
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8b30d782-d0ab-46f3-91fb-1d19696045dc
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd7348299-5a25-4b46-9956-ec002b869afa
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdcbac0bf-580d-4cd8-989d-8ed8c8690d2a
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationeafda2e3-8c7d-4c32-a6bf-41efc422cd40
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf995eada-28e5-43f5-89c3-5d2ba4941c61
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationff657a29-eb51-4af8-a370-007e3b9c574c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1324408e-e205-485a-95b8-0bf86861249d
relation.isResourceTypeOfPublication4c433ef5-3937-4530-8252-cca17d715747
relation.isResourceTypeOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4c433ef5-3937-4530-8252-cca17d715747
rioxxterms.projectMOP-114997, MOP-2455048, FDN-143225fr
rioxxterms.project.funder-nameCanadian Institutes of Health Researchfr
rioxxterms.project.funder-nameFoundation of the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute.fr
rioxxterms.versionAccepted Manuscript (AM)fr
rioxxterms.version-of-recordhttps://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000869fr
Fichiers
Bundle original
Voici les éléments 1 - 5 sur 6
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom :
1 - 2018-08-07_LVNC in BAV_Revised_PP_Main Prevalence of left ventricule non compaction criteria in adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve versus healthy contraol subjects.docx
Taille :
150.63 KB
Format :
Microsoft Word XML
Description :
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom :
1 - Figure 2 - A_Mono Image.pdf
Taille :
205.14 KB
Format :
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description :
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom :
1 - Figure 3 - A_Mono Image.pdf
Taille :
230.2 KB
Format :
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description :
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom :
1 - Figure 3 - B_Mono Image.pdf
Taille :
219.68 KB
Format :
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description :
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom :
1- Figure 1.pdf
Taille :
6.99 MB
Format :
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description :