Publication :
CO2 valence framing : is it really any different from just giving the amounts ?

Notice brève
bul.description.provenancemcp clfr
bul.rights.dateAccepPubl2018-07-10fr
bul.rights.periodeEmbargoP2Yfr
bul.rights.typeDatedateAcceptationfr
dc.audience.peerreview1fr
dc.contributor.authorWaygood, Edward Owen Douglas
dc.contributor.authorAvineri, Erel
dc.coverage.spatialJaponfr
dc.coverage.spatialÉtats-Unisfr
dc.coverage.spatialCanadafr
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-19T19:12:30Z
dc.date.available2021-01-10T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-17fr
dc.description.abstractPrevious experiments have shown that negative valence framing in comparison to positive framing augments the perceived differences between CO2 emission amounts. This means that, in order to increase the chance that an individual will perceive a difference between two CO2 amounts, it is better to highlight the amount by which the other choice is larger. However, a number of questions remain with respect to such findings. First, those experiments did not test whether such framing results in differences as compared to just presenting the amounts. Choice experiments and travel behavior change programs often simply use the attribute values (e.g. 300 g/km versus 250 g/km), thus it is important to know whether valence framing would result in differences as compared to this valence-free or “neutral” framing. Second, some research suggests that loss-framing may be less effective in Asian as opposed to Western contexts. Further, as CO2 emissions information is relatively new, and an individual will not always be presented with a second value (i.e. no context), how might that affect responses? Thus, in this research we describe the results of an experiment with four treatments and four key measures. The four treatments being: “no context”, “neutral”, “positive-framing”, and “negative-framing”. Lastly, when attempting to motivate support or change from the general population, aggregate information rather than individual information is often used. Is it possible that such general information would influence an individual?fr
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trd.2018.07.011fr
dc.identifier.issn1361-9209fr
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/30384
dc.languageengfr
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subjectValence framingfr
dc.subjectCO2 emissionsfr
dc.subjectInfluencefr
dc.subjectMotivationfr
dc.subjectInformationfr
dc.subjectInternational comparisonfr
dc.subject.rvmInformation environnementalefr
dc.subject.rvmGaz à effet de serre -- Évaluationfr
dc.subject.rvmTransport -- Choix des modes -- Aspect de l'environnementfr
dc.subject.rvmCommunication en environnementfr
dc.titleCO2 valence framing : is it really any different from just giving the amounts ?fr
dc.typearticle de recherche
dc.type.legacyCOAR1_1::Texte::Périodique::Revue::Contribution à un journal::Article::Article de recherchefr
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransportation research. Part D, Transport and environment, Vol. 63 (August), 718-732 (2018)fr
dcterms.date.accepted2018-07-10
dspace.accessstatus.time2023-03-26 18:00:58
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1c991e42-20fa-4ec3-9906-8e2ba93bc1ac
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1c991e42-20fa-4ec3-9906-8e2ba93bc1ac
relation.isResourceTypeOfPublication4c433ef5-3937-4530-8252-cca17d715747
relation.isResourceTypeOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4c433ef5-3937-4530-8252-cca17d715747
rioxxterms.versionAMfr
rioxxterms.version-of-recordhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.07.011fr
Fichiers
Bundle original
Voici les éléments 1 - 1 sur 1
Vignette d'image
Nom :
CO2 VALENCE FRAMING_preprint.docx
Taille :
80.7 KB
Format :
Microsoft Word XML
Description :
Télécharger
Collections
Articles publiés dans des revues avec comité de lecture