Pour savoir comment effectuer et gérer un dépôt de document, consultez le « Guide abrégé – Dépôt de documents » sur le site Web de la Bibliothèque. Pour toute question, écrivez à corpus@ulaval.ca.
 

Personne :
Ridde, Valéry

En cours de chargement...
Photo de profil

Adresse électronique

Date de naissance

Projets de recherche

Structures organisationnelles

Fonction

Nom de famille

Ridde

Prénom

Valéry

Affiliation

Université Laval. Faculté des sciences infirmières

ISNI

ORCID

Identifiant Canadiana

ncf10573261

person.page.name

Résultats de recherche

Voici les éléments 1 - 3 sur 3
  • PublicationAccès libre
    Adaptation et conditions d’utilisation d’un outil d’analyse des interventions au regard des inégalités sociales de santé
    (S.F.S.P., 2018-09-19) Hébert, Catherine; Ridde, Valéry; Nour, Kareen; Tardieu, Émilie; Guichard, Anne; Lafontaine, Ginette
    Si la lutte contre les inégalités sociales de santé ne devrait pas uniquement incomber aux acteurs de santé publique, ces derniers doivent au moins s’assurer que leurs interventions en tiennent compte. Or, les acteurs concernés par ces interventions ne disposent que de peu d’outils, pour les soutenir dans cette démarche. Ainsi, sur la base d’une recherche réalisée en France, nous avons adapté, testé et développé au Québec, un outil visant à aider les acteurs à mieux considérer les inégalités sociales de santé. L’article vise à présenter la démarche ayant mené à l’adaptation de l’outil au contexte québécois, à décrire l’outil, puis à discuter des enjeux de son intégration dans les pratiques professionnelles. Le processus d’adaptation de l’outil a suivi une démarche participative et constructive entre chercheurs, gestionnaires et intervenants afin de disposer d’un outil utile et utilisable. Il est composé de cinq rubriques associées aux interventions (planification, mise en œuvre, évaluation, pérennisation et pouvoir d’agir) et de 44 éléments de réflexion présentés sous la forme de questions. L’outil est accompagné d’un guide d’utilisation, d’un glossaire et d’exemples d’application. Il poursuit une démarche réflexive et constructive où les acteurs concernés par une intervention peuvent être accompagnés par un tiers médiateur afin d’analyser leur prise en compte des inégalités sociales de santé. L’appréciation permet ainsi de proposer collectivement des pistes d’améliorations, que l’on peut suivre dans le temps, afin de mieux prendre en considération l’équité dans les interventions de santé publique. L’article conclue sur certains enjeux liés à son intégration dans les pratiques professionnelles.
  • PublicationAccès libre
    Equity at all cost – and any price – for research funding in Canada?
    (Canadian Public Health Association, 2018-09-19) Ridde, Valéry; Guichard, Anne
    This commentary is in response to the May 2018 announcement by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) of a new procedure to ensure fairer access to health research funding for participants. As such, all applicants to CIHR’s funding programs will now be required to complete a five-question questionnaire covering the dimensions of gender, age, Indigenous origin, visible minorities, and disability. On this basis, CIHR intends to gain a better understanding of the performance of its funding programs in terms of equity. In this commentary, we wish to question the theoretical and conceptual assumptions of a vision of equity framed principally in terms of diversity upstream from the research process as a founding principle of more equitable health research in Canada. We draw attention to the fact that diversity policies do not necessarily challenge inequity in research funding or in research projects. Having established the urgent need for action on equity to improve the health of populations, we recall the ethical responsibility of research and researchers to better take the various facets of equity in research into account. We recommend expanding efforts to understand and reflexively address both equity and diversity when considering the performance of population health research programs
  • PublicationAccès libre
    A comparative study of community verification processes in the context of performance-based financing in Mali and Burkina Faso
    (Emerald Publishing Limited, 2023-09-04) Zitti, Tony; Coulibaly, Abdourahmane; Gali-Gali, Idriss Ali Zakaria; Ridde, Valéry; Turcotte-Tremblay, Anne-Marie
    Purpose This article compares the processes of community verification (CV) and user satisfaction surveys during the implementation of performance-based financing (PBF) in Mali and Burkina Faso. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopted a qualitative approach based on a multiple-case study design. Data were collected from August 10 to 25, 2017, in Mali, and from January to May 2016 in Burkina Faso. In Mali, 191 semi-structured interviews were conducted with investigators (people who collect information from health centre users in the communities, using survey tools), users, users' relatives, and health workers in three of the 10 health districts in the Koulikoro region. In Burkina Faso, 241 non-participatory observation sessions were recorded in a research diary, and 92 semi-structured interviews and informal discussions were conducted with investigators, community verifiers, users, PBF support staff at the national level, and administrative staff in one of the 15 health districts involved in PBF. The data were analysed inductively. Findings In both Mali and Burkina Faso, the delayed availability of survey forms led to a delay in starting the surveys. In Mali, to get off to a quick start, some investigators went to health centres to conduct the sampling with their supervisors. In both countries, investigators reported difficulties in finding certain users in the community due to incorrect spelling of names, lack of telephone details, incomplete information on the forms, common or similar sounding names within the community, and user mobility. There was little interference from health workers during user selection and surveys in both countries. In both countries, many surveys were conducted in the presence of the user's family (husband, father-in-law, brother, uncle, etc.) and the person accompanying the investigator. Also in both countries, some investigators filled in forms without investigating. They justified this data fabrication by the inadequate time available for the survey and the difficulty or impossibility of finding certain users. In both countries, the results were not communicated to health centre staff or users in either country. Research limitations/implications CV and user satisfaction surveys are important components of PBF implementation. However, their implementation and evaluation remain complex. The instruments for CV and user satisfaction surveys for PBF need to be adapted and simplified to the local context. Emphasis should be placed on data analysis and the use of CV results.