Usefulness of TEE as the primary imaging technique to guide transcatheter transapical aortic valve implantation

Authors: Bagur, Rodrigo HernanRodés-Cabau, JosepDoyle, DanielDe Larochellière, RobertVilleneuve, Jacques; Lemieux, Jérôme; Bergeron, SébastienCôté, MélanieBertrand, OlivierPibarot, PhilippeDumont, Éric
Abstract: Objectives: The aim of this study was to: 1) determine the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the primary technique to guide transapical (TA) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI); and 2) to compare TEE with angiography as the primary imaging modality for TA-TAVI guidance. Background: TEE has been routinely used as an adjunct to angiography during TA-TAVI procedures, but very few data exist on the use of TEE as the primary imaging technique guiding TA-TAVI. Methods: One hundred consecutive high-risk patients (mean age 79 ± 9 years, mean logistic EuroSCORE: 25.8 ± 17.6%) who underwent TA-TAVI in our center were included. The Edwards valve was used in all cases, and all procedures were performed in an operating room without hybrid facilities. The TA-TAVI was primarily guided by angiography in the first 25 patients (A-TAVI group) and by TEE in the last 75 patients (TEE-TAVI group). Procedural, 30-day, and follow-up results were evaluated. Results: No differences were observed between groups at baseline except for a higher (p = 0.001) prevalence of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation in the TEE-TAVI group. The procedure was successful in 97.3% and 100% of the patients in the TEE-TAVI and A-TAVI groups, respectively (p = 1.0), and a lower contrast volume was used in the TEE-TAVI group (12 [5 to 20] ml vs. 40 [20 to 50] ml, p < 0.0001). There were no differences between groups in the occurrence of valve malposition needing a second valve (TEE-TAVI: 5.3%; A-TAVI: 4%; p = 1.0) or valve embolization (TEE-TAVI: 1.3%; A-TAVI: 4%; p = 0.44). The results regarding post-procedural valve hemodynamic status and aortic regurgitation were similar between groups. The survival rates at 30-day and 1-year follow-up were 87% and 75% in the TEE-group and 88% and 84% in the A-TAVI group, respectively (log-rank = 0.49). Conclusions: TEE-TAVI was associated with similar acute and midterm results as A-TAVI and significantly reduced contrast media use during the procedures. These results suggest the feasibility and safety of performing TA-TAVI procedures in an operating room without hybrid facilities, but larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Document Type: Article de recherche
Issue Date: 1 February 2011
Open Access Date: Restricted access
Document version: VoR
Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/7830
This document was published in: JACC : Cardiovascular Imaging, Vol. 4 (2), 115–124 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.10.009
American College of Cardiology Foundation
Alternative version: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.10.009
21329894
Collection:Articles publiés dans des revues avec comité de lecture

Files in this item:
SizeFormat 
Bagur2011-12432.pdf
1.15 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
All documents in CorpusUL are protected by Copyright Act of Canada.